No Teeth Means No Job: How Poor Oral Health Impacts Job Prospects

January 24, 2013 | Print Print  | Share/Bookmark  | 1 response

No teeth means no job: How poor oral health impacts job prospects
By Mercedes White , Deseret News
Published: Thursday, Dec. 27 2012 12:25 p.m. MST

Studies show bad teeth prevent otherwise qualified candidates from getting
jobs or promotions. Although the U.S. is on the cutting edge of innovations in
dentistry, many Americans have poor oral health and crooked or missing teeth and
don’t go to the dentist because they don’t have insurance and can’t afford to
pay out of pocket for care. (Shutterstock)
Earlier this year, the managers at a Salt Lake City counseling office were
struggling to fill a position at their front desk. They’d blazed through a
string of potential candidates sent by a staffing agency, but none had the
qualifications they were looking for. And then the agency sent a candidate named
Shelly (not her real name), a 35-year-old mother of three who’d re-entered the
work force because her husband was laid off.

“Everyone in the office loved her, ” recalls Miriam Brown, who also worked the
front desk. As a temporary employee, Shelly was pleasant to work with, competent
and kind to the patients. “We all told our boss to hire her because she was so

Instead, management hired someone else.

At a staff meeting, Brown asked her manager why Shelly wasn’t hired permanately.
The response shocked everyone in the room. The office manager said Shelly had
bucked and crooked teeth. “He said it wasn’t the image we wanted to project at
our clinic,” Brown said.

This is not an isolated incident. Studies show bad teeth prevent otherwise
qualified candidates from getting jobs or promotions. Although the U.S. is on
the cutting edge of innovations in dentistry, many Americans have poor oral
health and crooked or missing teeth and don’t go to the dentist because they
don’t have insurance and can’t afford to pay out of pocket for care. The scope
of the problem is widespread: close to half of Americans are without dental
insurance, according to data from the Department of Health and Human Services.

Limited access

Access to dental care in America is limited in two basic ways. First, many don’t
have access to insurance, and second there is a shortage of dentists who are
willing to treat the poor.

About 130 million Americans, 43 percent of the population, have no dental
coverage whatsoever, according to a 2012 report from the U.S. Senate
Subcommittee on Primary Health and Aging. The data show that although spending
on dental services amounts to just under 5 percent of total health care
expenditures, 44 percent of dental bills are paid for directly out of patients’

This sheds some light on why low-income families are more likely to suffer from
compromised oral health: they don’t have the wiggle room in their budgets to pay
for dental services. Instead of heading to the dentist when they experience
tooth pain or injury, they go to the emergency room.

A study published in the Annals of Emergency Medicine found that in 2009 more
than 800,000 patients visited emergency rooms across the country seeking
treatment for preventable oral diseases.

The poorest Americans, recipients of Medicaid, are eligible for dental benefits,
but many report difficulty finding a dentist willing to see them. Many dentists
don’t accept patients on Medicaid because the reimbursements don’t cover the
cost of doing business, according to a representative from the Washington State
Dental Association, who said that on average, 60 percent of dentists’ fees are
eaten up by overhead. “I can’t afford to do Medicaid,” said Cesar Sabates,
president of the Florida Dental Association.

In fact, only 20 percent of the nation’s practicing dentists provide care to
people with Medicaid, and of those who do, only a small percentage devote a
substantial portion of their practice to serving the poor, according to the
report by the U.S. Senate Subcommittee on Primary Health and Aging. This helps
explain why only 38 percent of children on Medicaid received dental services in
2009, according to Bernard Sanders, who authored a 2012 Senate report on the
American dental crisis.

Compromised health, crooked impressions

Public health officials are quick to point out that dental issues are medical
issues. An example of the high cost of neglected dental care is the death of
Deamonte Driver of Maryland. The 12-year-old boy died in 2007 from an infected
tooth. Although he had Medicaid, his mother was unable to find a dentist in
their area who would see her children and accept their coverage, and by the time
his aching tooth got any attention, the abcess had spread to his brain. An $80
tooth extraction could have saved his life.

As Driver’s story illustrates, dental checkups can detect the signs of microbial
infections, immune disorders and some cancers. The phrase “the mouth is a
mirror” underscores information about general health that comes from examining
oral tissues.

Poor oral health may also interfere with vital functions like breathing,
swallowing, eating and speaking, which further compromise the well-being of the
afflicted. For example, without teeth to chew, it can be difficult to get
adequate nutrition.

There is a social cost of going without dental care, too. Numerous studies show
a strong correlation between appearance and income. Research by Daniel
Hamermesh, professor of economics at the University of Texas, found that better
than average looking people earn 5 to 10 percent more than average looking
people, who earn 5 to 10 percent more than below average looking people. “Teeth
are an important component of physical appearance,” Hamermesh said.

In an effort to isolate the economic value of teeth, Sherry Glied and Matthew
Neidell of Columbia University School of Public Health looked at the link
between fluoridation and income. “Childhood access to fluoridated water leads to
better teeth,” Glied said. Glied and Neidell found that women who grew up in
communities with fluoridated water earn 4 percent more than similar women who
did not.

But income isn’t the only thing impacted by the appearance of a person’s teeth.
Researchers have noted pronounced negative associations with crooked, discolored
and decaying teeth. Approximately 40 percent of respondents to a 2012 study by
Kelton Research said that they would not date someone with crooked teeth. And
about 73 percent said that people with straight teeth are more trustworthy.

When Israeli researchers digitally manipulated the teeth on the subjects in
photographs and asked people to give their first impressions, they noted similar
patterns of discrimination against people with poor oral health. People with
crooked, discolored and missing teeth were judged to be of limited intelligence,
low class, bad parents, less professional, less physically beautiful and lacking
social skills.

Improving access

Currently, low-income and minority families experience more oral disease, yet
they receive less care, according to Bernard Sanders, author of a 2012 Senate
report on the dental care crisis in America. “It is our ethical and moral
imperative to commit to providing access to dental care for all, both to improve
health and to reduce overall costs,” he wrote.

Sanders advocates introducing a new work force model by adding dental
therapists, the dental equivalent of a nurse practitioner, to the system. More
than 50 countries around the world, including Canada, Great Britain and New
Zealand, use dental therapists. Minnesota is the only state where dental
therapists are authorized to practice. “I am trained to the level of a dentist,
but trained to do fewer things,” said Minnesota’s first registered dental
therapist, Christy Jo Fogerty, in a Frontline documentary, “Dollars and
Dentists,” that aired earlier this year.

Preliminary studies suggest dental therapists substantially increase access to
dental services and provide high quality, lower-cost care, according to Sanders.
Analysis by the Pew Research Center found that private practice dentists who add
dental therapists to their teams would maintain or improve their bottom lines.

Still, the American Dental Association is fiercely opposed to the proposal.
Lobbying efforts by the organization have successfully blocked the expansion of
the dental therapist model to other states.


Reader Comments

Add a Comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong> or its owner(s) is in no way responsible for any article, description, procedure, reference or dental product that may appear on this site. makes no warranty of any kind with respect to any dentists listed on this site or any subject matter included herein. The website could include some errors or inaccuracies and strives are made by to improve and update without notice. Any descriptions, specific treatments or references to any companies, dentist procedures, or articles does not imply endorsement of their services. The companies that are shown on this site may or may not have paid to advertise on our site. In no way does or its owner(s) replace the evaluation of a person’s dentist or health care provider. This site is intended for educational purposes only and should not be used as a substitute for visits with your family dentist or other health care provider.